[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHR064jwe=diZ9B-D+-SroCW1ZevkRDMosB7uDuc2VXZkFxmdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:12:01 +0000
From: Corentin Chary <corentincj@...aif.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Crismani <alessandro.crismani@...il.com>,
Mikhail Bakhterev <mike.bakhterev@...il.com>,
Patrick H <kernel@...storm.net>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] samsung-laptop: Disable if CONFIG_EFI=y
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> Acked-by: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>
>
> This is totally bogus and prevents users build a kernel which can work in
> either mode. As such its a regression.
Arg.. Sorry for that, I didn't realized that CONFIG_EFI=y was not
something rare these days.
> Do the detection check at runtime. If it was booted via EFI then don't
> grovel in places you shouldn't. Indeed its possible EFI should reserve
> those memory regions ?
I wonder how the windows driver works in this case.. Maybe they use
something completly different, and the SABI interface is still there
because nobody removed/disabled it ? In this case it's probably not a
good idea to use it on these machines since the implementation is
likely to be completly broken.
--
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists