[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509726D0.4010606@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 03:39:12 +0100
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Zhang, Jun" <jun.zhang@...el.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crash dump: don't delete non-E820_RAM during init
On 11/05/2012 02:37 AM, Zhang, Jun wrote:
> Hello, Gortmaker
> I will modify my subject. Thanks!
>
> Hello, Anvin
> from our three options, I think third option is better. But in 3) option, there are two choose, 3.1) is like memmap=REMOVERAM, 3.2) is memmap=CRASHKDUMP.
> In 3.1) we maybe need ifdef/endif within the { } of the function (like exactmap).
> In 3.2) we can remove the ifdef/endif.
> Which one is the better? Maybe you have a better solution, please share it.
> Thanks!
>
> Next is our three option.
> 1) my patch.
> 2) modify kexec, only pass two parameters -- memmap=544K@64K
> memmap=64964K@...68K, in kernel setup_memory_map, we can remove RAM
> range.
> 3) add extra optional, 3.1) like memmap=REMOVERAM
> 3.2) like memmap=CRASHKDUMP
>
Again, 2 would be better because it is a localized change to kexec. If
that works I don't see why there is any reason to change anything else.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists