[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6uuK6ew5uxh0BjtYAtPZCTLeUpHc4emXRAnMUtNmEzmGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 00:37:25 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
<panto@...oniou-consulting.com> wrote:
> The i2c2 alias cannot be resolved at compile time; there has to be
>
> a) A DT object format where unresolved aliases (symbols) are tracked
> b) A runtime DT linker that will resolve the alias, and will insert the
> i2c2-devices child nodes as children in the i2c2 node.
> c) A method to trigger platform device creation for the child nodes just
> inserted.
>
> DT core changes aren't bound to be easily accepted, so without having a clear
> signal from the DT maintainers that they would consider such a method people
> are just hesitant to go down this road.
I do agree and will accept such a method.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists