[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121105201754.7d82deff@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:17:54 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Petr Matousek <pmatouse@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: setting up CDB filters in udev (was Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block:
add queue-private command filter, editable via sysfs)
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:09:55 -0800
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hey, Alan.
>
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:12:08PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > There are two sensible choices here IMHO
> >
> > - The simple sysctl
> >
> > - Doing the job right
> >
> > A half way solution such as that you are proposing seems to me to achieve
> > nothing other than guaranteeing we'll have another pile of useless crap
> > to maintain forever as ABI.
>
> I'm all for simple. Just throw in a sysfs binary switch to allow all
> SG_IO for a given block device for users w/ write access. I'd be
> completely happy with that.
IMHO that's the best option for now - if it fixes the specific case of
concern right now. It's a trivial interface, it's trivial security (need
to check CAP_SYS_RAWIO to flip) and it means that the job can be done
properly when there is consensus without a whole extra legacy API stuck
behind.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists