[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50983D75.50009@calxeda.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:28:05 -0600
From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v2] arm: use devicetree to get smp_twd clock
On 11/04/2012 04:08 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 01:51:44PM -0500, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
>> -static struct clk *twd_get_clock(void)
>> +static struct clk *twd_get_clock(struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> - struct clk *clk;
>> + struct clk *clk = NULL;
>> int err;
>>
>> - clk = clk_get_sys("smp_twd", NULL);
>> + if (np)
>> + clk = of_clk_get(np, 0);
>> + if (!clk)
>
> What does a NULL return from of_clk_get() mean? Where is this defined?
Well, it's a valid path if (np) is NULL. I'll add an IS_ERR(clk) and
resubmit.
>> @@ -349,6 +348,10 @@ int __init twd_local_timer_register(struct twd_local_timer *tlt)
>> if (!twd_base)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + twd_clk = twd_get_clock(NULL);
>> +
>> + twd_clk = twd_get_clock(NULL);
>> +
>
> Why twice?
No good reason. I'll resubmit with it cleaned up. Thanks for the review.
--Mark Langsdorf
Calxeda, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists