[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hxnZezg6b+HhNtiE7stku2NB8C1eh-9q18POy3GMQhuig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:41:57 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <clark.williams@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] [RFC] nohz/cpuset: Start discussions on nohz CPUs
2012/11/5 Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:51:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 13:41 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> >
>> > > The no-CBs mask would be read-only for some time -- changed only at
>> > > boot. Longer term, I hope to allow run-time modification, but...
>> >
>> > but what? You're not looking to retire already are you? ;-)
>>
>> Not for a few decades. ;-)
>>
>> But let's add the no-CBs mask to sysfs when I add the ability to run-time
>> modify that mast.
>
> Well we are creating a user ABi with the boot time option. It would be
> best to get it right out of the door.
I believe that a static setting through a boot option is a nice first
step already. Runtime tuning may involve dynamic migration and other
headaches. The nocb patch is tricky enough to review ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists