linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scripts/sortextable: support objects with more than 64K sections.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:51:16 -0800
From:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
To:	Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@...cle.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/sortextable: support objects with more than 64K
 sections.

On 11/05/2012 01:06 AM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> Building with a large config and -ffunction-sections results in a large
> number of sections and sortextable needs to be able to handle that.
> Implement support for > 64K sections as modpost does.
>
> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie.iles@...cle.com>
> ---
>   scripts/sortextable.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   scripts/sortextable.h |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

I don't plan on extensively testing this, but I have no objections.

David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/