[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVPDZnXshvartbTt6gaGzcb+03sVq3Qm3apQQ8AVcQWerg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:16:43 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add firmware signature file check
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's just uncovered in the patch. As a easy solution, apply the
> patch like below to disallow the udev fw loading when signature check
> is enforced.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> index 575bc4c..93121c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> @@ -912,6 +912,13 @@ static int _request_firmware_load(struct firmware_priv *fw_priv, bool uevent,
> goto handle_fw;
> }
>
> + /* signature check isn't handled via udev fw loading */
> + if (sig_enforce) {
> + fw_load_abort(fw_priv);
> + direct_load = 1;
> + goto handle_fw;
> + }
> +
The above might be wrong if the firmware file doesn't exist in default
search paths. You should skip loading from user space only if
verify_signature() returns false. And the udev loading should be
resorted to if there is no such firmware file in default search paths.
> /* fall back on userspace loading */
> buf->fmt = PAGE_BUF;
>
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists