[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121106080354.GA21167@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:03:54 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/29] memcg: infrastructure to match an allocation to
the right cache
On Mon 05-11-12 16:28:37, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:35 +0400
> Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
>
> > +static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
> > +memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
>
> I still don't understand why this code uses __always_inline so much.
AFAIU, __always_inline (resp. __attribute__((always_inline))) is the
same thing as inline if optimizations are enabled
(http://ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html#func-always_inline).
Which is the case for the kernel. I was always wondering why we have
this __always_inline thingy.
It has been introduced back in 2004 by Andi but the commit log doesn't
say much:
"
[PATCH] gcc-3.5 fixes
Trivial gcc-3.5 build fixes.
"
Andi what was the original motivation for this attribute?
> I don't recall seeing the compiler producing out-of-line versions of
> "static inline" functions
and if it decides then __always_inline will not help, right?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists