[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121105163313.c555a2b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:33:13 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/29] memcg: skip memcg kmem allocations in
specified code regions
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:07:36 +0400
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
> This patch creates a mechanism that skip memcg allocations during
> certain pieces of our core code. It basically works in the same way
> as preempt_disable()/preempt_enable(): By marking a region under
> which all allocations will be accounted to the root memcg.
>
> We need this to prevent races in early cache creation, when we
> allocate data using caches that are not necessarily created already.
>
> ...
>
> +static inline void memcg_stop_kmem_account(void)
> +{
> + if (!current->mm)
> + return;
It is utterly unobvious to this reader why the code tests ->mm in this
fashion. So we need either smarter readers or a code comment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists