[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVOEagv_BgZCTzEgRSpaHEiM6ptNuXAePUaXDb8GfRogSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:03:58 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add firmware signature file check
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> At Tue, 6 Nov 2012 18:40:57 +0800,
>> It is true if all firmwares are signed on safe boot. If firmware is allowed
>> to be loaded from network or other non-fs place in secure distribution,
>> your patch will break this loading.
>
> Do we already have such a secure mechanism? How is the security
> assured?
I don't know, and my comments are just on your patch and the condition.
I understand secure guys should know if the condition may be true or false, :-)
>> The clue can be found from debug message.
>
> Debug messages are turned off on normal machines, unfortunately.
Kernel guys will put one eye on bug report, also enabling udev log
can help the problem too.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists