lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121106134831.GA969@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:48:31 +0100
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc:	rob@...dley.net, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	andre.przywara@....com, rjw@...k.pl, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:09:57PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> This patch add the power aware scheduler knob into sysfs:
> 
> $cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/available_sched_policy
> performance powersaving
> 
> $cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/current_sched_policy
> powersaving
> 
> The using sched policy is 'powersaving'. User can change the policy
> by commend 'echo':
>  echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/current_sched_policy
> 
> Power aware scheduling will has different behavior according to
> different policy:
> 
> performance: the current scheduling behaviour, try to spread tasks
> 		on more CPU sockets or cores.
> powersaving: will shrink tasks into sched group until the group's
> 		nr_running is up to group_weight.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 21 +++++++
>  drivers/base/cpu.c                                 |  2 +
>  include/linux/cpu.h                                |  2 +
>  kernel/sched/fair.c                                | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/sched/sched.h                               |  5 ++
>  5 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> index 6943133..1909d3e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> @@ -53,6 +53,27 @@ Description:	Dynamic addition and removal of CPU's.  This is not hotplug
>  		the system.  Information writtento the file to remove CPU's
>  		is architecture specific.
>  
> +What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/current_sched_policy
> +		/sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_policy/available_sched_policy
> +Date:		Oct 2012
> +Contact:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> +Description:	CFS scheduler policy showing and setting interface.
> +
> +		available_sched_policy shows there are 2 kinds of policy now:
> +		performance and powersaving.
> +		current_sched_policy shows current scheduler policy. And user
> +		can change the policy by writing it.
> +
> +		Policy decides that CFS scheduler how to distribute tasks onto
> +		which CPU unit when tasks number less than LCPU number in system
> +
> +		performance: try to spread tasks onto more CPU sockets,
> +		more CPU cores.
> +
> +		powersaving:     try to shrink tasks onto same core or same CPU
> +		until running task number beyond the LCPU number in the core
> +		or socket.
> +
>  What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu#/node
>  Date:		October 2009
>  Contact:	Linux memory management mailing list <linux-mm@...ck.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 6345294..5f6a573 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -330,4 +330,6 @@ void __init cpu_dev_init(void)
>  		panic("Failed to register CPU subsystem");
>  
>  	cpu_dev_register_generic();
> +
> +	create_sysfs_sched_policy_group(cpu_subsys.dev_root);

Are you sure you didn't just race with userspace, creating the sysfs
files after the device was created and announced to userspace?

If so, you need to fix this :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ