[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121106164214.GA18246@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:42:15 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, florianSchandinat@....de
Subject: Re: tty, vt: lockdep warnings
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:11:00PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > But a deadlock we have lived with for years. Without reverting,
> > we're prevented from discovering all the new deadlocks we're adding.
>
> We lived with it locking boxes up on users but not knowing why.
Circa 3.5 we got a lot more reports of this happening too for some reason.
Turns out that races are awfully resistant to bisecting too.
> The root
> cause is loading two different framebuffers with one taking over from
> another - that should be an obscure corner case and once the fuzz testing
> can avoid.
>
> I had a semi-informed poke at this and came up with a possible patch (not very tested)
If this fixes the real problems we've been seeing, I'll dance a jig.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists