linux-kernel - sched_debug / traverse allocation failures.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121106204947.GA1762@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:49:47 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: sched_debug / traverse allocation failures.

While fuzz-testing, I frequently run into this..

trinity-child4: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40d0
Pid: 21842, comm: trinity-child4 Not tainted 3.7.0-rc4+ #54
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81179ce9>] warn_alloc_failed+0xe9/0x150
 [<ffffffff816c24fc>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x1f8/0x209
 [<ffffffff8117e6f6>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x936/0xb60
 [<ffffffff811c2020>] alloc_pages_current+0xb0/0x120
 [<ffffffff81178ada>] __get_free_pages+0x2a/0x80
 [<ffffffff811ce299>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x39/0x190
 [<ffffffff811ce66d>] __kmalloc+0x27d/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff8120cc8d>] traverse+0x1bd/0x230
 [<ffffffff8120d0c0>] ? seq_lseek+0x120/0x120
 [<ffffffff8120d0c0>] ? seq_lseek+0x120/0x120
 [<ffffffff8120d41b>] seq_read+0x35b/0x3e0
 [<ffffffff816d1969>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x79/0xd0
 [<ffffffff8120d0c0>] ? seq_lseek+0x120/0x120
 [<ffffffff81257890>] proc_reg_read+0x80/0xc0
 [<ffffffff811e72dc>] vfs_read+0xac/0x180
 [<ffffffff811e758a>] sys_pread64+0x9a/0xb0
 [<ffffffff816d5f88>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6


I added some instrumentation to traverse, and it appears that the /proc file
in question is 'sched_debug'.

Most the time this is quite small, but can grow to large lengths it seems,
which when we're under memory fragmentation results in the spew above.

>From my reading of the code, it doesn't actually use the seq_operations,
to print out things record-at-a-time, but just dumps everything
in its ->open routine.

thoughts?

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/