[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121106215854.GA6626@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:58:54 +0000
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To: Christof Meerwald <cmeerw@...erw.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Holland <pholland@...be.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] epoll: replace EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE with
EPOLL_CTL_POKE
Christof Meerwald <cmeerw@...erw.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 04:13:12 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> [...]
> > EPOLL_CTL_POKE may be used to force an item into the epoll
> > ready list. Instead of disabling an item asynchronously
> > via EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE, this forces the threads calling
> > epoll_wait() to handle the item in its normal loop.
>
> That was my initial suggestion as well - see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/19/358
Thanks, missed that the first time around. Perhaps TRIGGER is a
better name than POKE :x
I'm hoping Paton has a chance to look at my implementation and
comment on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists