[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fw4mv11b.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:06:56 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
* Matthew Garrett:
> I'm not sure why you think that Fedora PXE installs will
> automatically wipe disks - they'll do whatever Kickstart tells them
> to do.
Or what the referenced initrd contains (which is not signed, for
obvious reasons). The point is that "the bootloader is signed by
Fedora" does not translate to "I can run this without worries".
I'm not sure if anybody has made promises in this direction. But lack
of a "do no harm" rule (which would have to prevent certain forms of
unattended installation for sure) means that we do not get that many
benefits out of Secure Boot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists