linux-kernel - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Xen acpi pad implement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC829233537B147@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:15:19 +0000
From:	"Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
CC:	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Xen acpi pad implement

Liu, Jinsong wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Makefile b/drivers/xen/Makefile
>>>> index 0e86370..a2af622 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/xen/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile
>>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_MCE_LOG)           += mcelog.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND)     += xen-pciback/
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PRIVCMD)            += xen-privcmd.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_ACPI_PROCESSOR)     += xen-acpi-processor.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_DOM0)                       += xen_acpi_pad.o
>>>>  xen-evtchn-y                         := evtchn.o
>>>>  xen-gntdev-y                         := gntdev.o
>>>>  xen-gntalloc-y                               := gntalloc.o
>> 
>> it should really depend on ACPI and maybe also X86, otherwise it is
>> going to break the ARM build 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Hmm, XEN_DOM0 has already depended on ACPI and X86_LOCAL_APIC (which
> depends on X86_64). 
> 

Ah, you and Konrad are right. I ignore XEN_DOM0 varies under different arch.
(But seems it not depends on X86 since it's logically an acpi stuff?).

Thanks,
Jinsong--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/