[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomr6wkNNi3tt=obzM=2atZfRLQ0V4XOzX__W1yB8UKgTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:19:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lists linaro-dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
PDSW-power-team <pdsw-power-team@....com>
Subject: [Query]: sched/fair: prio_changed_fair()
Hi Ingo/Peter,
I am trying to understand the complex scheduler code and just found
something incorrect (maybe i am not reading it well):
File: kernel/sched/fair.c
static void
prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
{
if (!p->se.on_rq)
return;
/*
* Reschedule if we are currently running on this runqueue and
* our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on
* this runqueue and our priority is higher than the current's
*/
if (rq->curr == p) {
if (p->prio > oldprio)
resched_task(rq->curr);
} else
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
}
Comment says that we must mark the task to be rescheduled, if we
are currently running and our priority has decreased. But in code we
are checking (p->prio > oldprio). i.e. reschedule if we were currently
running and our priority increased.
Sorry if i am wrong :(
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists