| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <000b01cdbcca$7925d2b0$6b717810$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:30:06 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Marek Belisko' <marek.belisko@...n-nandra.com>
Cc: 'Bryan Wu' <cooloney@...il.com>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] leds/tca6507: Add support for devicetree.
On Wednesday, November 07, 2012 3:25 AM Bryan Wu wrote
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Marek Belisko
> <marek.belisko@...n-nandra.com> wrote:
> > Support added only for leds (not for gpio's).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@...n-nandra.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Overall, this looks good to me. Maybe some question as below,
>
> -Bryan
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c b/drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c
> > index dabcf7a..496dd98 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-tca6507.c
> > @@ -667,6 +667,69 @@ static void tca6507_remove_gpio(struct tca6507_chip *tca)
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_GPIOLIB */
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +static struct tca6507_platform_data * __devinit tca6507_led_dt_init(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node, *child;
> > + struct tca6507_platform_data *pdata;
> > + struct led_info *tca_leds;
> > + int count = 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_child_of_node(np, child)
> > + count++;
> > + if (!count)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
>
> I saw many 'return NULL' here, why not return some error code in ERR_PTR?
>
> > + if (count > NUM_LEDS)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + tca_leds = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct led_info) * NUM_LEDS, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
>
> useless empty line.
>
> > + if (!tca_leds)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > +
>
> useless empty line.
>
> > + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> > + struct led_info led;
> > + u32 reg;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + led.name = of_get_property(child, "label", NULL) ? : child->name;
> > + led.default_trigger =
> > + of_get_property(child, "linux,default-trigger", NULL);
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®);
> > +
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + continue;
> > + tca_leds[reg] = led;
> > + }
> > + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct tca6507_platform_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pdata) {
> > + kfree(tca_leds);
>
> Do we need to kfree here? I think devm_zalloc() will take care of this
> if the driver failed to register.
If devm_kzalloc() fails, tca6507_probe() will return '-ENODEV'.
In this case, kfree() is unnecessary in this case, when devm_kzalloc()
is used.
Moreover, even if kfree() is necessary, devm_kfree() should be used
instead of kfree().
Marek Belisko, please refer to this document.
: http://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/device-drivers/API-devm-kzalloc.html
Thank you.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
>
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pdata->leds.leds = tca_leds;
> > + pdata->leds.num_leds = NUM_LEDS;
> > +
> > + return pdata;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id of_tca6507_leds_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "leds-tca6507", },
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +
> > +#else
> > +static int __devinit tca6507_led_dt_init(struct i2c_client *client, struct tca6507_platform_data
> *data)
> > +{
> > + return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define of_tca6507_leds_match NULL
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static int __devinit tca6507_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > {
> > @@ -683,9 +746,12 @@ static int __devinit tca6507_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > return -EIO;
> >
> > if (!pdata || pdata->leds.num_leds != NUM_LEDS) {
> > - dev_err(&client->dev, "Need %d entries in platform-data list\n",
> > - NUM_LEDS);
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > + pdata = tca6507_led_dt_init(client);
> > + if (!pdata) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "Need %d entries in platform-data list\n",
> > + NUM_LEDS);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > }
> > tca = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*tca), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!tca)
> > @@ -750,6 +816,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver tca6507_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "leds-tca6507",
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .of_match_table = of_tca6507_leds_match,
> > },
> > .probe = tca6507_probe,
> > .remove = __devexit_p(tca6507_remove),
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists