[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121107095842.GY24532@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:58:42 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
w.sang@...gutronix.de, mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:36:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > OK, but then we need to pass the information obtained from _CRS
> > (presumably after some adjustments through _SRS) to drivers, or rather to
> > things like the SPI core, I2C core etc. so that they can create device
> > objects for drivers to bind to and quite frankly I don't see why not to use
> > ACPI resources for that.
>
> Nevertheless, the routines for parsing those resources should belong
> to the ACPI core, mostly to avoid code duplication.
Rafael,
So is the idea now that the ACPI core parses the resources and passes them
forward via struct acpi_device? I'm just wondering how to proceed with
these I2C and SPI enumeration patches.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists