[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509A53A5.5090909@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:27:17 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: rob@...dley.net, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
andre.przywara@....com, rjw@...k.pl, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: add sched_policy and it's sysfs interface
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
>> index 6345294..5f6a573 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
>> @@ -330,4 +330,6 @@ void __init cpu_dev_init(void)
>> panic("Failed to register CPU subsystem");
>>
>> cpu_dev_register_generic();
>> +
>> + create_sysfs_sched_policy_group(cpu_subsys.dev_root);
>
> Are you sure you didn't just race with userspace, creating the sysfs
> files after the device was created and announced to userspace?
Sorry for don't fully get you. Is the sysfs announced to userspace
just in 'mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys'?
The old powersaving interface: sched_smt_power_savings also
created here. and cpu_dev_init was called early before do_initcalls
which cpuidle/cpufreq sysfs were initialized.
Do you mean this line need to init as core_initcall?
Thanks for comments! :)
>
> If so, you need to fix this :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists