[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <509A735E.4080103@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:42:38 -0600
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: Joshua Emele <jemele@...il.com>
CC: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: OMAP: if available, scale the iva coprocessor
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2012 07:47 PM, Joshua Emele wrote:
> The iva coprocessor, available on some omap platforms, shares a voltage domain
> with the mpu. If cpufreq is active and the mpu processor is scaled down, the iva
> coprocessor should also be scaled. The goal is to make sure we do not ramp down
> the voltage on the domain and affect clocking on the iva coprocessor leading to
> a dsp crash.
>
> I only have access to an omap3evm-ish device, so I do not know what the iva
> clock name is for omap24xx and omap44xx. This detail can be added later if the
> general approach is approved.
>
> I have tested a version of this patch against the linux-3.3 kernel, so this my
> attempt at a forward port against the current mainline. I have based my patch
> series against linux-omap-pm/pm-next.
>
How about making use of CPUFREQ notifiers to handle it. I don't like
this series since it adds multi-media co-processor scaling into the
CPUFreq driver.
Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists