lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:25:16 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	lizefan@...wei.com, rjw@...k.pl,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] cgroup: add cgroup_subsys->post_create()

On Sat 03-11-12 01:38:27, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Currently, there's no way for a controller to find out whether a new
> cgroup finished all ->create() allocatinos successfully and is
> considered "live" by cgroup.
> 
> This becomes a problem later when we add generic descendants walking
> to cgroup which can be used by controllers as controllers don't have a
> synchronization point where it can synchronize against new cgroups
> appearing in such walks.
> 
> This patch adds ->post_create().  It's called after all ->create()
> succeeded and the cgroup is linked into the generic cgroup hierarchy.
> This plays the counterpart of ->pre_destroy().

Hmm, I had to look at "cgroup_freezer: implement proper hierarchy
support" to actually understand what is the callback good for. The above
sounds as if the callback is needed when a controller wants to use
the new iterators or when pre_destroy is defined.

I think it would be helpful if the changelog described that the callback
is needed when the controller keeps a mutable shared state for the
hierarchy. For example memory controller doesn't have any such a strict
requirement so we can safely use your new iterators without pre_destroy.

Anyway, I like this change because the shared state is now really easy
to implement.

> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

> ---
>  include/linux/cgroup.h |  1 +
>  kernel/cgroup.c        | 12 ++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> index fe876a7..b442122 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ int cgroup_taskset_size(struct cgroup_taskset *tset);
>  
>  struct cgroup_subsys {
>  	struct cgroup_subsys_state *(*create)(struct cgroup *cgrp);
> +	void (*post_create)(struct cgroup *cgrp);
>  	void (*pre_destroy)(struct cgroup *cgrp);
>  	void (*destroy)(struct cgroup *cgrp);
>  	int (*can_attach)(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset);
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index e3045ad..f05d992 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -4060,10 +4060,15 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup *parent, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		goto err_remove;
>  
> -	/* each css holds a ref to the cgroup's dentry */
> -	for_each_subsys(root, ss)
> +	for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
> +		/* each css holds a ref to the cgroup's dentry */
>  		dget(dentry);
>  
> +		/* creation succeeded, notify subsystems */
> +		if (ss->post_create)
> +			ss->post_create(cgrp);
> +	}
> +
>  	/* The cgroup directory was pre-locked for us */
>  	BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&cgrp->dentry->d_inode->i_mutex));
>  
> @@ -4281,6 +4286,9 @@ static void __init cgroup_init_subsys(struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
>  
>  	ss->active = 1;
>  
> +	if (ss->post_create)
> +		ss->post_create(&ss->root->top_cgroup);
> +
>  	/* this function shouldn't be used with modular subsystems, since they
>  	 * need to register a subsys_id, among other things */
>  	BUG_ON(ss->module);
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ