[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121107170221.GE2660@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:02:21 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, rjw@...k.pl,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] cgroup: add cgroup_subsys->post_create()
Hello, Michal.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:25:16PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > This patch adds ->post_create(). It's called after all ->create()
> > succeeded and the cgroup is linked into the generic cgroup hierarchy.
> > This plays the counterpart of ->pre_destroy().
>
> Hmm, I had to look at "cgroup_freezer: implement proper hierarchy
> support" to actually understand what is the callback good for. The above
> sounds as if the callback is needed when a controller wants to use
> the new iterators or when pre_destroy is defined.
>
> I think it would be helpful if the changelog described that the callback
> is needed when the controller keeps a mutable shared state for the
> hierarchy. For example memory controller doesn't have any such a strict
> requirement so we can safely use your new iterators without pre_destroy.
Hmm.... will try to explain it but I think it might be best to just
refer to the later patch for details. It's a bit tricky to explain.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists