linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <509B533B.7090907@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:37:47 +0800
From:	Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing

On 11/07/2012 11:25 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:27:12PM +0800, Zhouping Liu wrote:
>> Hello Mel,
>>
>> my 2 nodes machine hit a panic fault after applied the patch
>> set(based on kernel-3.7.0-rc4), please review it:
>>
>> <SNIP>
> Early initialisation problem by the looks of things. Try this please

Tested the patch, and the issue is gone.

>
> ---8<---
> mm: numa: Check that preferred_node_policy is initialised
>
> Zhouping Liu reported the following
>
> [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.000000] kernel BUG at mm/mempolicy.c:1785!
> [ 0.000000] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.000000] CPU 0
> ....
> [    0.000000] Call Trace:
> [    0.000000] [<ffffffff81176966>] alloc_pages_current+0xa6/0x170
> [    0.000000] [<ffffffff81137a44>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
> [    0.000000] [<ffffffff819efd9b>] kmem_cache_init+0x53/0x2d2
> [    0.000000] [<ffffffff819caa53>] start_kernel+0x1e0/0x3c7
>
> Problem is that early in boot preferred_nod_policy and SLUB
> initialisation trips up. Check it is initialised.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>

Tested-by: Zhouping Liu <zliu@...hat.com>

Thanks,
Zhouping

> ---
>   mm/mempolicy.c |    4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 11d4b6b..8cfa6dc 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,10 @@ static struct mempolicy *get_task_policy(struct task_struct *p)
>   		node = numa_node_id();
>   		if (node != -1)
>   			pol = &preferred_node_policy[node];
> +
> +		/* preferred_node_policy is not initialised early in boot */
> +		if (!pol->mode)
> +			pol = NULL;
>   	}
>   
>   	return pol;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/