[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gpq3oh9on.fsf@dworkin.scrye.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:48:24 -0700
From: Anthony Foiani <tkil@...ye.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] v3.0.x: mtd: check partition count not partition array pointer
mtd: check partition count not partition array pointer
The documentation claims that "nr_parts" is the determining factor,
while the code originally tested whether "parts" is non-null.
In at least one driver (fsl_elbc_nand), parts is never initialized to
0; even though nr_parts is correctly 0, add_mtd_partitions still tries
to create 0 partitions.)
Make the code adhere to the documentation.
A quick scan of all uses in the 3.0.51 kernel show that they correctly
rely on nr_parts rather than parts.
The current kernel has retired this function; I have not examined its
replacement to see if it has the same issue.
Signed-Off-By: Anthony Foiani <anthony.foiani@...il.com>
---
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
index c510aff..ac624df 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int mtd_device_register(struct mtd_info *master,
const struct mtd_partition *parts,
int nr_parts)
{
- return parts ? add_mtd_partitions(master, parts, nr_parts) :
+ return nr_parts ? add_mtd_partitions(master, parts, nr_parts) :
add_mtd_device(master);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtd_device_register);
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists