linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] leds: leds-gpio: Defer probing in case of deferred gpio probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <509B6A11.7070408@antcom.de>
Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:15:13 +0100
From:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
CC:	rpurdie@...ys.net, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] leds: leds-gpio: Defer probing in case of deferred
 gpio probing

Hi Bryan,

On 08/11/12 01:28, Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de> wrote:
>> This patch makes leds-gpio's probe() return -EPROBE_DEFER if any of the gpios
>> to register are deferred themselves. This makes a change of
>> gpio_leds_create_of()'s return value necessary: Instead of returning NULL on
>> error, we now use ERR_PTR() error coding.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
> 
> Sorry about this, actually I've already merged it into my for-next
> branch and forgot to reply this email.
> It's here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cooloney/linux-leds.git;a=commitdiff;h=424f58e4cebd76458b44e69ed31f7297808770cd
> So is the same one as here?

Thanks, still the same patch.

Could have seen this in your tree. ;-)

Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/