| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1352380498-23132-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:14:57 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] irq_work: Make self-IPIs optable
On irq work initialization, let the user choose to define it
as "lazy" or not. "Lazy" means that we don't want to send
an IPI (provided the arch can anyway) when we enqueue this
work but we rather prefer to wait for the next timer tick
to execute our work if possible.
This is going to be a benefit for non-urgent enqueuers
(like printk in the future) that may prefer not to raise
an IPI storm in case of frequent enqueuing on short periods
of time.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
---
include/linux/irq_work.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
kernel/irq_work.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
index a69704f..b28eb60 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
@@ -3,6 +3,20 @@
#include <linux/llist.h>
+/*
+ * An entry can be in one of four states:
+ *
+ * free NULL, 0 -> {claimed} : free to be used
+ * claimed NULL, 3 -> {pending} : claimed to be enqueued
+ * pending next, 3 -> {busy} : queued, pending callback
+ * busy NULL, 2 -> {free, claimed} : callback in progress, can be claimed
+ */
+
+#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING 1UL
+#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY 2UL
+#define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS 3UL
+#define IRQ_WORK_LAZY 4UL /* Doesn't want IPI, wait for tick */
+
struct irq_work {
unsigned long flags;
struct llist_node llnode;
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index b3c113a..7090b36 100644
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@ -12,22 +12,13 @@
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
+#include <linux/tick.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
-/*
- * An entry can be in one of four states:
- *
- * free NULL, 0 -> {claimed} : free to be used
- * claimed NULL, 3 -> {pending} : claimed to be enqueued
- * pending next, 3 -> {busy} : queued, pending callback
- * busy NULL, 2 -> {free, claimed} : callback in progress, can be claimed
- */
-
-#define IRQ_WORK_PENDING 1UL
-#define IRQ_WORK_BUSY 2UL
-#define IRQ_WORK_FLAGS 3UL
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, irq_work_list);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, irq_work_raised);
/*
* Claim the entry so that no one else will poke at it.
@@ -67,14 +58,18 @@ void __weak arch_irq_work_raise(void)
*/
static void __irq_work_queue(struct irq_work *work)
{
- bool empty;
-
preempt_disable();
- empty = llist_add(&work->llnode, &__get_cpu_var(irq_work_list));
- /* The list was empty, raise self-interrupt to start processing. */
- if (empty)
- arch_irq_work_raise();
+ llist_add(&work->llnode, &__get_cpu_var(irq_work_list));
+
+ /*
+ * If the work is flagged as "lazy", just wait for the next tick
+ * to run it. Otherwise, or if the tick is stopped, raise the irq work.
+ */
+ if (!(work->flags & IRQ_WORK_LAZY) || tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) {
+ if (!this_cpu_cmpxchg(irq_work_raised, 0, 1))
+ arch_irq_work_raise();
+ }
preempt_enable();
}
@@ -116,10 +111,19 @@ bool irq_work_needs_cpu(void)
*/
void irq_work_run(void)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
struct irq_work *work;
struct llist_head *this_list;
struct llist_node *llnode;
+
+ /*
+ * Reset the "raised" state right before we check the list because
+ * an NMI may enqueue after we find the list empty from the runner.
+ */
+ __this_cpu_write(irq_work_raised, 0);
+ barrier();
+
this_list = &__get_cpu_var(irq_work_list);
if (llist_empty(this_list))
return;
@@ -140,13 +144,15 @@ void irq_work_run(void)
* to claim that work don't rely on us to handle their data
* while we are in the middle of the func.
*/
- xchg(&work->flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY);
+ flags = work->flags & ~IRQ_WORK_PENDING;
+ xchg(&work->flags, flags);
+
work->func(work);
/*
* Clear the BUSY bit and return to the free state if
* no-one else claimed it meanwhile.
*/
- (void)cmpxchg(&work->flags, IRQ_WORK_BUSY, 0);
+ (void)cmpxchg(&work->flags, flags, flags & ~IRQ_WORK_BUSY);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_work_run);
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists