[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121108133145.GC3081@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 08:31:45 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: Matthew Fioravante <matthew.fioravante@...apl.edu>,
"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mail@...jiv.net" <mail@...jiv.net>,
"tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Kent Yoder <key@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add tpm_xenu.ko: Xen Virtual TPM frontend
driver
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:46:16AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > >>+typedef struct tpmif_tx_request tpmif_tx_request_t;
> > > > checkpatch warned on this new typedef - please run through checkpatch
> > > >and fix up that stuff.
> > > tpmif.h has a couple of typedefs which do trigger checkpatch
> > > warnings. However it looks like the paradigm for xen is to have
> > > these interface/io/<dev>if.h files and all of them have typedefs. I
> > > think in this case the typedef should probably stay.
> > >
> > > Konrad your thoughts here?
> >
> > Rip them out plea
>
> This is somewhere that Linux coding style and Xen coding style differ,
> so the typedefs should be removed from the Linux copy of these
> interfaces to match the Linux coding style, but they should stay in the
> Xen side canonical copy though.
Yes. Sorry for not making that clear.
>
> Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists