[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAAP30HVdducnECimoh=Buh3CRTLu0agg4GcKEA7B03EnXuAAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:49:27 -0200
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@...il.com>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@...onic-design.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de> wrote:
> On 08/11/12 12:23, Alban Bedel wrote:
>>>> It is intended, the formular for duty value in the register is:
>>>>
>>>> duty = (256 - 256*duty_ns/period_ns) % 256
>>>
>>> Where does this modulo defined? In the Manual, there is sth. like this
>>> defined for RELOADV (tables 606+607), but not for DUTY.
>>>
>>> Maybe I missed sth. in the manual. Link or hint appreciated!
>>
>> The manual doesn't mention this explicitly but you can see that without
>> the modulo when duty_ns==0 DUTY would be 256, but the register is only
>> 8 bits wide (ie. modulo 256). I made a few test and looked at the PWM
>> output on a scope they confirm this:
>>
>> DUTY HIGH LEVEL
>> 1 99.9%
>> 25 90.0%
>> 128 50.0%
>> 220 10.0%
>> 255 0.1%
>> 0 0.0%
>>
>> I'll resubmit the patch with the clamping in the correct order.
>
> Thanks for measuring. With this, your resubmitted patch make much more
> sense now.
>
> Roland
Alban,
I think you should include this measurements on the source code as
comments, for future reference.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists