linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:22:30 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Geremy Condra <gcondra@...gle.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp

On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Kees Cook wrote:

> This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
> improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping
> and nr changes more consistent"), this passes the seccomp regression
> test suite: https://github.com/redpig/seccomp

You should consider posting ARM specific patches to the ARM mailing list 
instead, where most people with an interest in reviewing those patches 
are listening: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/