[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121109081255.GC26007@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:12:55 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@...com>
Cc: paul@...an.com, tony@...mide.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
b-cousson@...com, hvaibhav@...com, anilkumar@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, nsekhar@...com,
gururaja.hebbar@...com, vaibhav.bedia@...com,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Add device-tree binding
support for APWM driver
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:52:19AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:23:11PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
[...]
> > static int __devinit ecap_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> __devinit can go away.
[...]
> > static int __devexit ecap_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> No __devexit please.
[...]
> > .remove = __devexit_p(ecap_pwm_remove),
>
> No __devexit_p() please.
Okay, ignore these comments. The annotation were not added in this patch
so they can be removed in a separate patch. Or when Greg finally removes
all traces of them.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists