linux-kernel - [PATCH V2] firmware loader: Fix the concurrent request_firmware() race for kref

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1352482042.15558.1622.camel@cliu38-desktop-build>
Date:	Sat, 10 Nov 2012 01:27:22 +0800
From:	Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	ming.lei@...onical.com
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH V2] firmware loader: Fix the concurrent request_firmware()
 race for kref_get/put


There is one race that both request_firmware() with the same
firmware name.

The race scenerio is as below:
CPU1                                                  CPU2
request_firmware() -->
_request_firmware_load() return err                   another request_firmware() is coming -->
_request_firmware_cleanup is called -->               _request_firmware_prepare -->
release_firmware --->                                 fw_lookup_and_allocate_buf -->
                                                      spin_lock(&fwc->lock)
...                                                   __fw_lookup_buf() return true
fw_free_buf() will be called -->                      ...
kref_put -->
decrease the refcount to 0
                                                      kref_get(&tmp->ref) ==> it will trigger warning
                                                                              due to refcount == 0
__fw_free_buf() -->
...                                                   spin_unlock(&fwc->lock)
spin_lock(&fwc->lock)
list_del(&buf->list)
spin_unlock(&fwc->lock)
kfree(buf)
                                                      After that, the freed buf will be used.

The key race is decreasing refcount to 0 and list_del is not protected together by
fwc->lock, and it is possible another thread try to get it between refcount==0
and list_del.

Fix it here to protect it together.

Acked-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
---
 drivers/base/firmware_class.c |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
index b44ed35..be5f7aa 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
@@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ static void __fw_free_buf(struct kref *ref)
 		 __func__, buf->fw_id, buf, buf->data,
 		 (unsigned int)buf->size);
 
-	spin_lock(&fwc->lock);
 	list_del(&buf->list);
 	spin_unlock(&fwc->lock);
 
@@ -263,7 +262,10 @@ static void __fw_free_buf(struct kref *ref)
 
 static void fw_free_buf(struct firmware_buf *buf)
 {
-	kref_put(&buf->ref, __fw_free_buf);
+	struct firmware_cache *fwc = buf->fwc;
+	spin_lock(&fwc->lock);
+	if (!kref_put(&buf->ref, __fw_free_buf))
+		spin_unlock(&fwc->lock);
 }
 
 /* direct firmware loading support */
-- 
1.7.0.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/