| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20121109120958.GC5210@krabat.ahsoftware>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 13:10:02 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm: memtest
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 09:48:18PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently discovered the lack of the command line parameter
> memtest for ARM. So I've made a patch.
Sorry, I've made again the failure to just use xclip with thunderbird
which resulted in a malformed patch. I've now even tried the "external
editor" extension, it doesn't help too. So now I'm using mutt.
Below is the patch again, hopefully not malformed. I've also noticed
that the existent memtest does an unnecessary step to zero the tested
memory, I've removed it by reversing the order of the tests.
So instead of
> Here is how dmesg does look like (memtest=4):
>
> --------- no error ---------
> [ 0.000000] Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
> [ 0.000000] early_memtest: # of tests: 4
> [ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern 00000000
> [ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern ffffffff
> [ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern 55555555
> [ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern aaaaaaaa
> [ 0.000000] early_memtest: wipe out test pattern from memory
> [ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern 00000000
> [ 0.000000] early_memtest: # of tests: 4
> [ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern 00000000
> [ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern ffffffff
> [ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern 55555555
> [ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern aaaaaaaa
> [ 0.000000] early_memtest: wipe out test pattern from memory
> [ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern 00000000
> [ 0.000000] Memory: 128MB = 128MB total
> [ 0.000000] Memory: 125648k/125648k available, 5424k reserved, 0K highmem
> --------- no error ---------
it now does look like
--------- no error ---------
[ 0.000000] Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
[ 0.000000] early_memtest: # of tests: 4
[ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern aaaaaaaa
[ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern 55555555
[ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern ffffffff
[ 0.000000] 0000000000 - 0000004000 pattern 00000000
[ 0.000000] early_memtest: # of tests: 4
[ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern aaaaaaaa
[ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern 55555555
[ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern ffffffff
[ 0.000000] 000054c000 - 0007ffb000 pattern 00000000
[ 0.000000] Memory: 128MB = 128MB total
[ 0.000000] Memory: 125648k/125648k available, 5424k reserved, 0K highmem
--------- no error ---------
Regards,
Alexander
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:24:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm: add memtest
Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
---
arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 11 ++++
arch/arm/mm/Makefile | 2 +
arch/arm/mm/init.c | 36 +++++++++++++-
arch/arm/mm/memtest32.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/memtest32.c
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
index 101b968..b14941f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
@@ -874,3 +874,14 @@ config ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS
help
This option allows the use of custom mandatory barriers
included via the mach/barriers.h file.
+
+config MEMTEST
+ bool "Memtest"
+ ---help---
+ This option adds a kernel parameter 'memtest', which allows memtest
+ to be set.
+ memtest=0, mean disabled; -- default
+ memtest=1, mean do 1 test pattern;
+ ...
+ memtest=4, mean do 4 test patterns.
+ If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Makefile b/arch/arm/mm/Makefile
index 8a9c4cb..8cbfda1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/Makefile
@@ -96,3 +96,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CACHE_FEROCEON_L2) += cache-feroceon-l2.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0) += cache-l2x0.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CACHE_XSC3L2) += cache-xsc3l2.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CACHE_TAUROS2) += cache-tauros2.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_MEMTEST) += memtest32.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index 9aec41f..0941946 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -584,6 +584,10 @@ static void __init free_highpages(void)
#endif
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMTEST
+extern void early_memtest32(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
+#endif
+
/*
* mem_init() marks the free areas in the mem_map and tells us how much
* memory is free. This is done after various parts of the system have
@@ -618,6 +622,9 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
reserved_pages = free_pages = 0;
for_each_bank(i, &meminfo) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMTEST
+ phys_addr_t memtest_start = 0xffffffff, memtest_end;
+#endif
struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[i];
unsigned int pfn1, pfn2;
struct page *page, *end;
@@ -629,12 +636,37 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
end = pfn_to_page(pfn2 - 1) + 1;
do {
- if (PageReserved(page))
+ if (PageReserved(page)) {
reserved_pages++;
- else if (!page_count(page))
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMTEST
+ /* something has cut a hole */
+ if (memtest_start != 0xffffffff) {
+ early_memtest32(memtest_start, memtest_end);
+ memtest_start = 0xffffffff;
+ }
+#endif
+ } else if (!page_count(page)) {
free_pages++;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMTEST
+ if (memtest_start == 0xffffffff) {
+ /* start of a block for memtest */
+ memtest_start = page_to_phys(page);
+ } else if (memtest_end != page_to_phys(page)) {
+ /* hole detected, call memtest */
+ early_memtest32(memtest_start, memtest_end);
+ /* and start with new values */
+ memtest_start = page_to_phys(page);
+ }
+ memtest_end = page_to_phys(page)+PAGE_SIZE;
+#endif
+ }
page++;
} while (page < end);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMTEST
+ if (memtest_start != 0xffffffff)
+ early_memtest32(memtest_start, memtest_end);
+ /* if bad memory was found, reserved_pages is wrong (without bad mem) */
+#endif
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/memtest32.c b/arch/arm/mm/memtest32.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..103c49f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/memtest32.c
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+/* This is just a checkpatch'ed copy of arch/x86/mm/memtest.c modified to use 32bit */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/pfn.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>
+
+static u32 patterns[] __initdata = {
+ 0, /* Has has to be 0 to leave memtest with zeroed memory */
+ 0xffffffffUL,
+ 0x55555555UL,
+ 0xaaaaaaaaUL,
+ 0x11111111UL,
+ 0x22222222UL,
+ 0x44444444UL,
+ 0x88888888UL,
+ 0x33333333UL,
+ 0x66666666UL,
+ 0x99999999UL,
+ 0xccccccccUL,
+ 0x77777777UL,
+ 0xbbbbbbbbUL,
+ 0xddddddddUL,
+ 0xeeeeeeeeUL,
+ 0x7a6c7258UL, /* yeah ;-) */
+};
+
+static void __init reserve_bad_mem(u32 pattern, u32 start_bad, u32 end_bad)
+{
+ pr_info(" %08lx bad mem addr %010lx - %010lx reserved\n",
+ (unsigned long) pattern,
+ (unsigned long) start_bad,
+ (unsigned long) end_bad);
+ memblock_reserve(start_bad, end_bad - start_bad);
+}
+
+static void __init memtest(u32 pattern, u32 start_phys, u32 size)
+{
+ u32 *p, *start, *end;
+ u32 start_bad, last_bad;
+ u32 start_phys_aligned;
+ const size_t incr = sizeof(pattern);
+
+ start_phys_aligned = ALIGN(start_phys, incr);
+ start = __va(start_phys_aligned);
+ end = start + (size - (start_phys_aligned - start_phys)) / incr;
+ start_bad = 0;
+ last_bad = 0;
+
+ for (p = start; p < end; p++)
+ *p = pattern;
+
+ for (p = start; p < end; p++, start_phys_aligned += incr) {
+ if (*p == pattern)
+ continue;
+ if (start_phys_aligned == last_bad + incr) {
+ last_bad += incr;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (start_bad)
+ reserve_bad_mem(pattern, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
+ start_bad = last_bad = start_phys_aligned;
+ }
+ if (start_bad)
+ reserve_bad_mem(pattern, start_bad, last_bad + incr);
+}
+
+static void __init do_one_pass(u32 pattern, u32 start, u32 end)
+{
+ u64 i;
+ phys_addr_t this_start, this_end;
+
+ for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
+ this_start = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_start, start, end);
+ this_end = clamp_t(phys_addr_t, this_end, start, end);
+ if (this_start < this_end) {
+ pr_info(" %010lx - %010lx pattern %08lx\n",
+ (unsigned long)this_start,
+ (unsigned long)this_end,
+ (unsigned long)cpu_to_be32(pattern));
+ memtest(pattern, this_start, this_end - this_start);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/* default is disabled */
+static int memtest_pattern __initdata;
+
+static int __init parse_memtest(char *arg)
+{
+ ssize_t ret __always_unused;
+
+ if (arg)
+ ret = kstrtoint(arg, 0, &memtest_pattern);
+ else
+ memtest_pattern = ARRAY_SIZE(patterns);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+early_param("memtest", parse_memtest);
+
+void __init early_memtest32(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int idx = 0;
+
+ if (!memtest_pattern)
+ return;
+
+ pr_info("early_memtest: # of tests: %d\n", memtest_pattern);
+ for (i = memtest_pattern-1; i < UINT_MAX; --i) {
+ idx = i % ARRAY_SIZE(patterns);
+ do_one_pass(patterns[idx], start, end);
+ }
+}
--
1.7.8.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists