lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uHLrdJPX-Lq32mBpB2S5SmGw7N57N-Hk+a3aexUE87=wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:43:54 +0100
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc:	Christian König <deathsimple@...afone.de>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: tegra: Add HDMI support

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...onic-design.de> wrote:
> Actually what I had in mind was a packed binary representation of
> infoframes as specified by HDMI 1.3a (I don't have access to 1.4, but I
> would think it doesn't differ in this respect) in section 5.3 and 5.3.5
> more specifically. According to the specification, the ECC bytes only
> come into play at a later stage, when data is actually transmitted on
> the TMDS link (Section 5.2.3). Tegra, nouveau and radeon also seem to be
> doing the checksumming in hardware, so I guess we don't need to compute
> the ECC bytes in software at all (for now).
>
> Once we have this for the AVI infoframes I guess the same concept can be
> used for audio infoframes and for vendor-specific infoframes (for HDMI
> 1.4 3D).

Iirc there's more than one checksum: The ECC field at byte 3 and the
checksum field at byte 4. All intel hw computes the ECC itself, but
some want us to store the infoframe with an empty ECC byte as
placeholder, whereas others (sdvo encoders) insert that byte
themselves, i.e. the infoframe is actually one byte shorter. In any
case, that kind of mangling can be done in the driver with easy.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ