[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHTX3dKYJ_rWy-bWdhz24R=0ksw9YDixtqpJfEwRGcffu6vwkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:53:47 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: zynq: move ttc timer code to drivers/clocksource
2012/11/5 Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> 2012/10/29 Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>:
>> > Suggested cleanup by Arnd Bergmann. Move the ttc timer.c code to
>> > drivers/clocksource, and out of the mach-zynq directory.
>> >
>> > The common.h (which only held the timer declaration) was renamed to
>> > xilinx_ttc.h and moved into include/linux.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>
>> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> > ---
>> > arch/arm/mach-zynq/Makefile | 2 +-
>> > arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 +
>> > arch/arm/mach-zynq/timer.c => drivers/clocksource/xilinx_ttc.c | 1 -
>> > arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.h => include/linux/xilinx_ttc.h | 4 ++--
>> > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> > rename arch/arm/mach-zynq/timer.c => drivers/clocksource/xilinx_ttc.c (99%)
>> > rename arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.h => include/linux/xilinx_ttc.h (91%)
>>
>> Not going to apply this patch till there is clean way how to move all
>> drivers there. Especially I don't like to add xilinx_ttc.h to
>> include/linux folder.
>
> Okay; I think it's best to defer the moving of the ttc driver from this
> patchset. It is not a dependency of the clk driver support stuff.
> If you agree, I can spin up a v2 of the patchset w/o this change, and
> without the serial CONFIG_OF stuff. Should v2 contain the patches
> you've already pulled into testing?
Sure and I see you have done which is good.
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists