linux-kernel - Re: [arc-linux-dev] Re: UAPI for new arches (was Re: [GIT PULL] User API Disintegrate: Preparatory patches)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9377.1352726040@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:14:00 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com,
	"arnd\@arndb.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arch\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [arc-linux-dev] Re: UAPI for new arches (was Re: [GIT PULL] User API Disintegrate: Preparatory patches)

Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:

> >> Per you email from last week, When I ran the disintergrate-one.pl script
> >> myself I saw a whole bunch of empty UAPI files being generated with
> >> references in orig header.  I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
> > Can you give an example of such a header?
> 
> tlb.h - despite having __KERNEL__ guard in orig file. Here's how I did it.
> 
> 1. In my orig tree, I created arch/arc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild, with
> following 2 lines
> 
> # UAPI Header export list
> include include/uapi/asm-generic/Kbuild.asm
> 
> 2.  ./disintegrate-one.pl arch/arc/include/asm/tlb.h
> arch/arc/include/uapi/asm/tlb.h
> 
> This generates a empty uapi/asm/tlb.h, a reference to it in asm/tlb.h
> and is also exported from Kbuild.asm - all 3 of which are wrong.

Actually, this is the correct operation - it's just that there's nothing in
tlb.h to export.  (Note that Kbuild.asm is not modified, but rather
uapi/asm/Kbuild.  asm/Kbuild would too, but there's no export line there to be
removed.)

However... tlb.h isn't exported in Kbuild.asm - nor is it exported in arc's
asm/Kbuild, so the script shouldn't be run on that.

> But now that I think about it - I was wrong to call this script for
> all/any arch headers. It should be done only for the ones in
> include/uapi/asm-generic/Kbuild.asm or any specific ones that arch wants
> to export (cachectl.h for our case).

Exactly so.  I should probably have mentioned that, but I've had it automated
for so long, that I don't think about it any more.  You should only call it
for arch headers

I've attached a script that I use to work out which files need disintegration
in a directory.  Run as:

	genfilelist.pl arch/arc/include/asm/

I get:

	byteorder.h
	cachectl.h
	page.h
	ptrace.h
	setup.h
	sigcontext.h
	signal.h
	swab.h
	unistd.h

as being all that you need to disintegrate.  Almost everything seems to be
generic.

David

View attachment "genfilelist.pl" of type "text/x-perl" (1686 bytes)