lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1352698922.1834.1.camel@rzhang1-mobl4>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:42:02 +0800
From:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:	Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	durgadoss.r@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] thermal: Add new thermal trend type to support
 quick cooling

On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:51 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 09:21, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 11:56 +0530, Amit Kachhap wrote:
> >> On 8 November 2012 11:31, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:56 +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
> >> >> This modification adds 2 new thermal trend type THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL
> >> >> and THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL. This thermal trend can be used to quickly
> >> >> jump to the upper or lower cooling level instead of incremental increase
> >> >> or decrease.
> >> >
> >> > IMO, what we need is a new more aggressive cooling governor which always
> >> > uses upper limit when the temperature is raising and lower limit when
> >> > the temperature is dropping.
> >> Yes I agree that a new aggressive governor is the best approach but
> >> then i thought adding a new trend type is a simple solution to achieve
> >> this and since most of the governor logic might be same as the
> >> step-wise governor. I have no objection in doing it through governor.
> >> >
> > hmmm,
> > I think a more proper way is to set the cooling state to upper limit
> > when it overheats and reduce the cooling state step by step when the
> > temperature drops.
> 
> No actually I was thinking of having a  simple governor with a feature
> like it only sets to upper level and lower level. Also since the
> temperature sensor is capable of interrupting for both increase in
> threshold(say 100C)  and fall in threshold (say 90C), so polling or
> step increments is not needed at all.
> Currently stepwise governor governor does that so we might change the
> macro name as,
> THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_STEP,
> THERMAL_TREND_DROP_STEP,
> THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_MAX,
> THERMAL_TREND_DROP_MAX,
> 
> and file step_wise.c can be named as state_wise.c or trend_wise.c.
> 
> I am not sure if it is the best way . How do you feel ?
> 
this sounds good to me.
I'd like to see Durga' comments on this as well.

thanks,
rui
> > what do you think?
> >
> > thanks,
> > rui
> >
> >> > I can write such a governor if you do not have time to.
> >> ok. thanks
> >> >
> >> > thanks,
> >> > rui
> >> >>  This is needed for temperature sensors which support rising/falling
> >> >> threshold interrupts and polling can be totally avoided.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...aro.org>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>  drivers/thermal/step_wise.c |   19 +++++++++++++++----
> >> >>  include/linux/thermal.h     |    2 ++
> >> >>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> >> >> index 1242cff..0d2d8d6 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> >> >> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
> >> >>   *       state for this trip point
> >> >>   *    b. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, use lower cooling
> >> >>   *       state for this trip point
> >> >> + *    c. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, use highest cooling
> >> >> + *       state for this trip point
> >> >> + *    d. if the trend is THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, use lowest cooling
> >> >> + *       state for this trip point
> >> >>   */
> >> >>  static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
> >> >>                                       enum thermal_trend trend)
> >> >> @@ -50,7 +54,10 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
> >> >>       } else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING) {
> >> >>               cur_state = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> >> >>                           (cur_state - 1) : instance->lower;
> >> >> -     }
> >> >> +     } else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL)
> >> >> +             cur_state = instance->upper;
> >> >> +     else if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL)
> >> >> +             cur_state = instance->lower;
> >> >>
> >> >>       return cur_state;
> >> >>  }
> >> >> @@ -87,7 +94,8 @@ static void update_instance_for_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> >> >>  }
> >> >>
> >> >>  static void update_instance_for_dethrottle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> >> >> -                             int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type)
> >> >> +                             int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type,
> >> >> +                             enum thermal_trend trend)
> >> >>  {
> >> >>       struct thermal_instance *instance;
> >> >>       struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> >> >> @@ -101,7 +109,10 @@ static void update_instance_for_dethrottle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> >> >>               cdev = instance->cdev;
> >> >>               cdev->ops->get_cur_state(cdev, &cur_state);
> >> >>
> >> >> -             instance->target = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> >> >> +             if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL)
> >> >> +                     instance->target = instance->lower;
> >> >> +             else
> >> >> +                     instance->target = cur_state > instance->lower ?
> >> >>                           (cur_state - 1) : THERMAL_NO_TARGET;
> >> >>
> >> >>               /* Deactivate a passive thermal instance */
> >> >> @@ -133,7 +144,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> >> >>       if (tz->temperature >= trip_temp)
> >> >>               update_instance_for_throttle(tz, trip, trip_type, trend);
> >> >>       else
> >> >> -             update_instance_for_dethrottle(tz, trip, trip_type);
> >> >> +             update_instance_for_dethrottle(tz, trip, trip_type, trend);
> >> >>
> >> >>       mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> >> >>  }
> >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> >> >> index 807f214..8bce3ec 100644
> >> >> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> >> >> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> >> >> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ enum thermal_trend {
> >> >>       THERMAL_TREND_STABLE, /* temperature is stable */
> >> >>       THERMAL_TREND_RAISING, /* temperature is raising */
> >> >>       THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING, /* temperature is dropping */
> >> >> +     THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL, /* Apply highest cooling action*/
> >> >> +     THERMAL_TREND_DROP_FULL, /* Apply lowest cooling action*/
> >> >>  };
> >> >>
> >> >>  /* Events supported by Thermal Netlink */
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ