[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1352757066.32153.5@snotra>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:06 -0600
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.7-rc5
On 11/12/2012 03:02:46 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > JFYI, when comparing v3.7-rc5 to v3.7-rc4[3], the summaries are:
> > - build errors: +14/-4
>
> 14 regressions:
> + drivers/virt/fsl_hypervisor.c: error: 'MSR_GS' undeclared (first
> use in this function): => 799:93
These reports would be more useful if the actual .config were provided,
rather than just saying "powerpc randconfig".
I doubt this particular one is a regression; it looks like the
dependencies have always been too weak (patch sent) and you're just
comparing different randomly-generated configs.
> powerpc-randconfig
>
> + error: relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC64_REL24 against symbol
> `._mcount' defined in .text section in arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.o:
> (.text+0x1ff9eb8) => (.text+0x1ffa274), (.text+0x1ff7840)
>
> powerpc-allyesconfig
It's been over 3 years since powerpc-allyesconfig built (it's just too
big for the relocation model the kernel uses) -- how is this a
regression?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists