[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1211130944161.3577@localhost>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:44:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
dchinner@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] loop: Limit the number of requests in the bio list
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:53:01 -0500
> From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, dchinner@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] loop: Limit the number of requests in the bio list
>
> Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > + if (lo->lo_bio_count >= lo->lo_queue->nr_requests) {
> > + unsigned int nr;
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> > + nr = lo->lo_queue->nr_requests - (lo->lo_queue->nr_requests/8);
> > + wait_event_interruptible(lo->lo_req_wait,
> > + lo->lo_bio_count < nr);
> > + spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_lock);
> > + }
>
> So, blk_queue_make_request already initialized q->nr_congestion_on and
> q->nr_congestion_off. Is there a reason you didn't simply use
> queue_congestion_on_threshold and queue_congestion_off_threshold?
The reason is that I did not knew about those :) Thanks for pointing
it out I'll take a look at it.
Thanks!
-Lukas
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists