linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: threat regulators with constant volatage as fixed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:00:09 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: threat regulators with constant volatage
 as fixed

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 09:48:52AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> Some drivers has additional logic for fixed regulators. Let regulator core
> to threat regulators which cannot change their voltage due to applied

YM "treat".

> +	if (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)
> +		return rdev->desc->n_voltages ? : -EINVAL;

Please don't perpetuate the use of ? : as it's not a triumph of
legibility (even worse than the regular ternery operator).  I realise
that the original code did this but there's no need to carry on doing
the same thing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)