linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, RFT] [PATCH] staging: ft1000: unify struct ft1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201211131111.38721.linux@rainbow-software.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:11:38 +0100
From:	Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
To:	Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>
Cc:	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <greg@...ah.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, RFT] [PATCH] staging: ft1000: unify struct ft1000_info between USB and PCMCIA drivers

On Monday 12 November 2012, Belisko Marek wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org> 
wrote:
> > Unify struct ft1000_info between ft1000-usb and ft1000-pcmcia and move it
> > to common ft1000.h.
> >
> > ft1000-pcmcia seems to work. Please test ft1000-usb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000.h      |   33 +-----
> >  drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000_hw.c   |   21 ++-
> >  drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000_proc.c |   10 +-
> >  drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c   |  147
> > ++++++++++---------- .../staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_download.c    |
> >   70 +++++----- drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_hw.c      |   99
> > +++++++------- drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_proc.c    |    4
> > +-
> >  drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c     |   30 ++--
> >  drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.h     |   54 +------
> >  drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000.h                    |   35 +++++
> >  10 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 267 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000.h
> > b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000.h index adb436e..65f7ab6
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000.h
> > @@ -31,41 +31,10 @@
> >  #define SUCCESS        0x00
> >  #define FAILURE        0x01
> >
> > -struct ft1000_info {
> > -       struct net_device_stats stats;
> > -       u16 DrvErrNum;
> > -       u16 AsicID;
> > +struct ft1000_pcmcia {
>
> To be consistent can you please name also usb part not ft100_device
> but e.g. ft1000_usb or something?

Yes, that's a good idea. I'd like to do that in a separate patch, this one is 
already big enough.

> > @@ -1179,8 +1179,6 @@ static int ft1000_open(struct net_device *dev)
> >         struct ft1000_info *pInfo = netdev_priv(dev);
> >         struct timeval tv;
> >
> > -       DEBUG("ft1000_open is called for card %d\n", pInfo->CardNumber);
>
> ^^^ Why removing this debug?

I don't remember exactly (this is from an old patch) but probably because I 
didn't want to add code to reach CardNumber (which should be removed too).
The debug messages are a mess, some are completely useless, some should be 
non-debug instead.

If you have the USB hardware, please test if this patch does not break 
anything. I have only a PCMCIA card.

-- 
Ondrej Zary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/