linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/19] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:45:30 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/19] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration


* Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:

> NOTE: This patch is based on "sched, numa, mm: Add fault driven
>	placement and migration policy" but as it throws away 
>	all the policy to just leave a basic foundation I had to 
>	drop the signed-offs-by.

So, much of that has been updated meanwhile - but the split 
makes fundamental sense - we considered it before.

One detail you did in this patch was the following rename:

     s/EMBEDDED_NUMA/NUMA_VARIABLE_LOCALITY

> --- a/arch/sh/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ config VSYSCALL
>  config NUMA
>  	bool "Non Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) Support"
>  	depends on MMU && SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA && EXPERIMENTAL
> +	select NUMA_VARIABLE_LOCALITY
>  	default n
>  	help
>  	  Some SH systems have many various memories scattered around
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>
..aaba45d 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -696,6 +696,20 @@ config LOG_BUF_SHIFT
>  config HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
>  	bool
>  
> +#
> +# For architectures that (ab)use NUMA to represent different memory regions
> +# all cpu-local but of different latencies, such as SuperH.
> +#
> +config NUMA_VARIABLE_LOCALITY
> +	bool

The NUMA_VARIABLE_LOCALITY name slightly misses the real point 
though that NUMA_EMBEDDED tried to stress: it's important to 
realize that these are systems that (ab-)use our NUMA memory 
zoning code to implement support for variable speed RAM modules 
- so they can use the existing node binding ABIs.

The cost of that is the losing of the regular NUMA node 
structure. So by all means it's a convenient hack - but the name 
must signal that. I'm not attached to the NUMA_EMBEDDED naming 
overly strongly, but NUMA_VARIABLE_LOCALITY sounds more harmless 
than it should.

Perhaps ARCH_WANT_NUMA_VARIABLE_LOCALITY_OVERRIDE? A tad long 
but we don't want it to be overused in any case.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/