[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121113110454.GE28341@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:04:54 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Clark <rob.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: add get_user() support for 8 byte types
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:31:50PM -0600, Rob Clark wrote:
> right, that is what I was worried about.. but what about something
> along the lines of:
>
> case 8: { \
> if (sizeof(x) < 8) \
> __get_user_x(__r2, __p, __e, __l, 4); \
> else \
> __get_user_x(__r2, __p, __e, __l, 8); \
> break; \
> } \
>
> maybe we need a special variant of __get_user_8() instead to get the
> right 32bits on big vs little endian systems, but I think something
> roughly along these lines could work.
The problem with that is... big endian systems - where the 32-bit word we
want is the second one, so you can't just reduce that down to a 32-bit
access like that. You also need to add an offset to the pointer in the BE
case (which can be done.)
I'd suggest calling the 4-byte version in there __get_user_xb() and doing
the 4-byte offset for BE inside that (or aliasing it to __get_user_x for
LE systems).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists