[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A248AD.9000705@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:18:37 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
CC: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
software@...sler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: i2c-ocores: Add irq support for sparc
On 11/13/2012 05:10 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 05:59:50PM +0100, Andreas Larsson wrote:
>> Add sparc support by using platform_get_irq instead of platform_get_resource.
>> There are no platform resources of type IORESOURCE_IRQ for sparc, but
>> platform_get_irq works for sparc. In the non-sparc case platform_get_irq
>> internally uses platform_get_resource.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
>> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - platform_get_irq now works for sparc, so that is used for all platforms
>> - Acked by Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
>>
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
>> index bffd550..0b71dc6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ocores.c
>> @@ -267,7 +267,8 @@ static int __devinit ocores_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct ocores_i2c *i2c;
>> struct ocores_i2c_platform_data *pdata;
>> - struct resource *res, *res2;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + int irq;
>> int ret;
>> int i;
>>
>> @@ -275,8 +276,8 @@ static int __devinit ocores_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (!res)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - res2 = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
>> - if (!res2)
>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (irq < 0)
>> return -ENODEV;
>
> Why not pass the error code you got?
I believe that should actually be a check for 'irq <= 0' as it returns
NO_IRQ on error.
>>
>> i2c = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*i2c), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -313,7 +314,7 @@ static int __devinit ocores_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> ocores_init(i2c);
>>
>> init_waitqueue_head(&i2c->wait);
>> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, res2->start, ocores_isr, 0,
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ocores_isr, 0,
>> pdev->name, i2c);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot claim IRQ\n");
>
> Rest looks good.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists