[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121113174000.6457a68b@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:40:00 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@...as.com>,
General Discussion of SQLite Database
<sqlite-users@...ite.org>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
drh@...ci.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] light weight write barriers
> > Barriers are pretty much universal as you need them for power off !
>
> I'm afraid, no storage (drives, if you like this term more) at the moment supports
> barriers and, as far as I know the storage history, has never supported.
The ATA cache flush is a write barrier, and given you have no NV cache
visible to the controller it's the same thing.
> Instead, what storage does support in this area are:
Yes - the devil is in the detail once you go beyond simple capabilities.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists