[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A29E28.5040303@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:23:20 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Geremy Condra <gcondra@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] arch/arm: support seccomp
On 11/10/2012 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> This adds support for seccomp BPF to ARM. When built with the seccomp
> improvement patch waiting in linux-next ("seccomp: Make syscall skipping
> and nr changes more consistent"), this passes the seccomp regression
> test suite: https://github.com/redpig/seccomp
I don't know if this matters much on ARM, but should something like
https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git;a=commit;h=dee1ae5a05149f30baeccb4b8f68f22525ba9ca2
be added?
--Andy
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Kees
>
> ---
> v5:
> - clean up seccomp failure path, as requested by Will Deacon.
> v4:
> - fixed syscall_get_arch, thanks to Will Deacon.
> v3:
> - updates suggested by Russell King:
> - reduced scope of expansion
> - leveraged TIF_SYSCALL_WORK bit mask
> - fixed syscall==-1 short-circuit logic
> v2:
> - expanded ptrace_syscall_trace() into both callers and do
> secure_computing() hookup there, as requested by Al Viro.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists