[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50A2C21D.6070108@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:56:45 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: Introduce Intel PowerClamp Driver
On 11/13/2012 1:16 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:03:51PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
>> Intel PowerClamp driver performs synchronized idle injection across
>> all online CPUs. The goal is to maintain a given package level C-state
>> ratio.
>>
>> Compared to other throttling methods already exist in the kernel,
>> such as ACPI PAD (taking CPUs offline) and clock modulation, this is often
>> more efficient in terms of performance per watt.
>>
>> Please refer to Documentation/thermal/intel_powerclamp.txt for more details.
>
> If I read this correctly, this forces a group of CPUs into idle for
> about 600 milliseconds at a time. This would indeed delay grace periods,
6ms not 600
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists