linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] bug.h: Make BUILD_BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50A2C88F.5010902@att.net>
Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:24:15 -0600
From:	Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] bug.h: Make BUILD_BUG_ON generate compile-time
 error

Borislav,

Please note that this patch has changed slightly since you Acked it.  I
have moved the location of the negative-size array code to the end of
the macro.  I don't think this really matters honestly, but I figured
this was the best place to put that change.

Daniel

On 11/13/2012 04:13 PM, danielfsantos@....net wrote:
> Negative sized arrays wont create a compile-time error in some cases
> starting with gcc 4.4 (e.g., inlined functions), but gcc 4.3 introduced
> the error function attribute that will.  This patch modifies
> BUILD_BUG_ON to behave like BUILD_BUG already does, using the error
> function attribute so that you don't have to build the entire kernel to
> discover that you have a problem, and then enjoy trying to track it down
> from a link-time error.
>
> Also, we are only including asm/bug.h and then expecting that
> linux/compiler.h will eventually be included to define __linktime_error
> (used in BUILD_BUG_ON). This patch includes it directly for clarity and
> to avoid the possibility of changes in <arch>/*/include/asm/bug.h being
> changed or not including linux/compiler.h for some reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/bug.h |   32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h
> index ccd44ce..dd4f506 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bug.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  #define _LINUX_BUG_H
>  
>  #include <asm/bug.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  
>  enum bug_trap_type {
>  	BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE = 0,
> @@ -42,25 +43,30 @@ struct pt_regs;
>   * @condition: the condition which the compiler should know is false.
>   *
>   * If you have some code which relies on certain constants being equal, or
> - * other compile-time-evaluated condition, you should use BUILD_BUG_ON to
> + * some other compile-time-evaluated condition, you should use BUILD_BUG_ON to
>   * detect if someone changes it.
>   *
> - * The implementation uses gcc's reluctance to create a negative array, but
> - * gcc (as of 4.4) only emits that error for obvious cases (eg. not arguments
> - * to inline functions).  So as a fallback we use the optimizer; if it can't
> - * prove the condition is false, it will cause a link error on the undefined
> - * "__build_bug_on_failed".  This error message can be harder to track down
> - * though, hence the two different methods.
> + * The implementation uses gcc's reluctance to create a negative array, but gcc
> + * (as of 4.4) only emits that error for obvious cases (e.g. not arguments to
> + * inline functions).  Luckily, in 4.3 they added the "error" function
> + * attribute just for this type of case.  Thus, we use a negative sized array
> + * (should always create an error on gcc versions older than 4.4) and then call
> + * an undefined function with the error attribute (should always create an
> + * error on gcc 4.3 and later).  If for some reason, neither creates a
> + * compile-time error, we'll still have a link-time error, which is harder to
> + * track down.
>   */
>  #ifndef __OPTIMIZE__
>  #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]))
>  #else
> -extern int __build_bug_on_failed;
> -#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition)					\
> -	do {							\
> -		bool __cond = !!(condition);			\
> -		((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(__cond)]));		\
> -		if (__cond) __build_bug_on_failed = 1;		\
> +#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition)						\
> +	do {								\
> +		bool __cond = !!(condition);				\
> +		extern void __build_bug_on_failed(void)			\
> +			__compiletime_error("BUILD_BUG_ON failed");	\
> +		if (__cond)						\
> +			__build_bug_on_failed();			\
> +		((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(__cond)]));			\
>  	} while(0)
>  #endif
>  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/