linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH RESEND] regulator: tps65910: fix BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <331ABD5ECB02734CA317220B2BBEABC13EA6B07A@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:25:15 +0000
From:	"AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] regulator: tps65910: fix BUG_ON() shown with
 vrtc regulator

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:49:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:24:39AM +0530, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > Fix BUG_ON() error if tps65910 VRTC regulator is used with out
> > rdev->desc->volt_table data. Recent changes in regulator core driver
> > which add support for "regulator_list_voltage_table" have BUG_ON() if
> > regulator descriptor do not have voltage table information. This patch
> > adds the voltage table information to fix the issue.
> 
> This is already applied...  got dropped from -next for a day for some
> reason but it's there.  When resending please do say why.
> 

Hi Mark,

Sorry for the noise (My bad missed the version change details). I have
checked in regulator/for-next tree and not found, so resend the patch
thanks for you time.

Thanks
AnilKumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/